Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
Top 10 holders hold 52.3% of the circulating float.
Scanned 4d ago. Scan again before you trade.
- FAILHolder concentration
- WARNPrior pump-and-dump mark
- WARNChecks with missing data
DexProof recorded PING as CAUTION on Robinhood Chain under formula v1.61, in verdict #1163 published 26 Oct 2026 (UTC). Of 28 checks, 15 passed, 2 warned, 1 failed and 10 could not be run.
Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
Top 10 holders hold 52.3% of the circulating float.
Scanned 4d ago. Scan again before you trade.
Price
—
Liquidity
—
Volume 24h
—
FDV
—
Buys 24h
—
Age
—
Top 10 holders hold 52.3% of the circulating float.
On raw total supply that's 9.9%, because 72.8% of total supply sits in liquidity pools and is excluded from the float. The float figure is measured against supply outside the pools, so it also moves when pool liquidity moves. A further 8.2% of total supply is held in a permanent launchpad locker with no withdrawal path, so it can never re-enter circulation and is excluded from the float. The single largest holder is , a smart-account wallet, holding 17.9% of the float on its own.
Crashed after launch: on 2026-09-19 the price or liquidity fell 95% or more below its 72-hour peak, and a second market source confirmed it.
This often happens when early buyers sell. On its own it does not mean the contract or its liquidity is unsafe.
On that scan, 8 checks had missing or incomplete data. (Shortened from the original receipt.)
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
This token was created by a contract, which has no transactions of its own to read.
A pull by the creator cannot be ruled out.
Applies to: Funder rug history, Deployer launch history, Funding lineage
Many people launch through the same contract, so rugs among the tokens it made are not one launcher's record. The launchpad's own record names , but that address has launched 156 tokens — a shared relayer, not one person, so no history is attributed to that address.
Many people launch through the same contract, so its launch history is nobody's in particular. The launchpad's own record names , but that address has launched 156 tokens — a shared relayer, not one person, so no history is attributed to that address.
Money paid into a contract like that is nobody's funding history in particular. The launchpad's own record names , but that address has launched 156 tokens — a shared relayer, not one person, so no history is attributed to that address.
We could not read this token's market data on this scan, so its pool depth was not measured.
This says what we could see, not what the token is.
Market data unavailable for FDV/liquidity ratio.
Market data unavailable for turnover.
Market data unavailable for wash-trade analysis.
This token was created by a contract, which sends no transactions of its own, so fee or limit changes by its creator could not be checked.
Pool creation time unavailable.
No canonical asset collision.
No scam tag on the explorer.
The token's main pool and every other pool large enough to matter let it be sold in our test.
8 hook-free pools are too small to matter and were set aside. 6 more pools are too small to matter and were not tested. This does not show how large a sale those pools can absorb, or that the Universal Router itself will execute it. A fresh wallet can also send this token to the pool, the transfer a sell actually makes, which the V4 Quoter alone cannot exercise.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
No prior honeypot on record.
LP locked: 100.0% of this V4 pool's liquidity is held by Launchpad V2 Launch Locker, a trusted locker contract, and the lock is permanent, so that liquidity can never be withdrawn.
This pool is on Uniswap V4 and holds 99.1% of the liquidity this scan could read. 2 other pools charge a fee too large to trade through, so nothing a holder owns is at risk there.
No owner() function.
No single owner key surface.
Not an upgradeable proxy.
The code is fixed.
Contract source is verified on the explorer, but matched from another address with identical bytecode (a shared bytecode database) rather than proven against this one.
The token contract has no privileged capabilities found in the audited source and bytecode.
This is about the token contract only. Its main pool runs the Pons V2 Meme Hook, which can take up to 10% of each trade.
No active paid boosts on DexScreener.
The paid-order list could not be read this scan, so purchased listings are not covered by this result.
Bytecode did not match any known clone template.
Contract deployed 894h ago.
Launched on Pons V2 and graduated to a DEX pool.
Creator bought an unknown share of the raise. The pool's creation transaction could not be fully read this scan, so its launch buys are unknown.
Fingerprint UNKNOWN, but source is verified, so the code is readable by anyone.