DexProof recorded Kimchi as CRITICAL on Robinhood Chain under formula v2.0.1, in verdict #1625 published 30 Oct 2026 (UTC). Of 28 checks, 9 passed, 5 warned, 4 failed and 10 could not be run.
Don't trade this token.
The wallet that sent this token's launch transaction removed liquidity from this token's pool.
Price
—
Liquidity
—
Volume 24h
—
FDV
—
Buys 24h
—
Age
—
The wallet that sent this token's launch transaction removed liquidity from this token's pool.
That wallet is , and it made 1 withdrawal on Uniswap V4, and that withdrawal closed the position completely.
The largest liquidity provider, (a plain wallet), controls 100.0% of this pool's liquidity and can withdraw it at any moment.
It is not the deployer. Renouncing ownership does not protect against this. None of this V4 pool's liquidity is burned or locked. This pool is on Uniswap V4 and holds 100.0% of the liquidity we could read. This pool was opened by . That wallet is not the token's creator and not its launchpad. The liquidity described above is that wallet's own position, not something the creator controls. Anyone can open a pool for any token. 2 other pools charge a fee too large to trade through, so nothing a holder owns is at risk there.
The token contract has privileged powers: address block, a switch that can block transfers or selling, upgrade code.
Someone can still use them, or we couldn't tell who controls them.
This exact code was used by 6 other tokens, and 6 of them lost most of their value or had their liquidity removed.
They include 0x7795…0bce, 0x9759…5e81, 0xa3bb…5d1a. That describes those tokens, and it does not say who created this one.
We couldn't finish the sell test on the other exchanges we checked.
We couldn't get a clear result from any pool we tested, so we can't say whether this token can be sold.
This token crashed after launch.
On 2026-10-22, its price or liquidity fell 95% or more below its 72-hour peak, and a second data source confirmed it. This often happens when early buyers sell. On its own it does not mean the contract or its liquidity is unsafe.
We couldn't read some checks on this scan, so the verdict is limited.
A failed read is not a clean result. This describes what we could see, not the token.
This contract still has an active owner: .
The code can be changed, but we found no admin address for it.
That does not prove the power to change it is gone. Another upgrade route may still be live.
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
Applies to: Funder rug history, Deployer launch history, Funding lineage, Tax manipulation
So we can't check for past rugs, because many people launch through it. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so we don't attribute any history to that address.
So we can't check its past launches. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so we don't attribute any history to that address.
So we can't trace who funded it. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so we don't attribute any history to that address.
So we can't check whether it changed fees or limits.
We could not read this token's market data, so we did not measure its pool depth.
That is a gap in what we could see, not a finding about the token.
We don't have the market data needed to compare this token's value at full supply with its liquidity.
We don't have the volume and liquidity figures needed to check turnover.
We don't have the market data needed to check for wash trading.
We could not find when this token's pool was created.
A contract deployed this token, but that contract is not in the launchpad registry.
So we can't tell where it launched.
This token does not share its name and symbol with any real tokenized share.
The explorer has not tagged this contract as a scam.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
This token has no honeypot mark in our records.
Top 10 holders hold 2% of the tokens in circulation.
Against total supply, the top 10 hold 0.2%. Liquidity pools hold 86.1% of total supply, and we leave them out of the tokens in circulation. The top 10 share also moves when pool liquidity moves, even if no holder trades.
This contract's source is verified on the explorer.
This is about its implementation at .
No paid promotion found on DexScreener.
This contract was 9 days old at this scan.
The source is verified, so anyone can read the code.
We could not match it to a known template.
Robinhood